The Candy-floss Kid

Advanced Member
  • Content count

    663
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

98 Prominent

1 Follower

About The Candy-floss Kid

  • Rank
    Apprentice

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://vimeo.com/candyflosskid/videos

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  1. Hi Dobby, try upping your rez high enough for surface details then switch to surface mode >voxels >decimate > now use your surface brushes to apply mesh polygon detail where required. In other words your working with a dynamic tessellation where detail is required but not subdividing globally. V4.5 is slow on my system - curious if you ran a 4.1instead version whether you would report better speeds for sculpting. The voxel workspace is equivalent to working in a permanent state of dynamesh (as Carlosan points out) and shadowbox combined. This makes 3DCoat a very fast method of blocking out form and also testing whether ideas and even scenes will work in 3d early on. In that sense 3DCoat is liberating at this stage and will inspire designs that perhaps may not be reached with ZBrush so intuitively. Beyond this stage - there is no advantage with regard sculpting, merely personal preference over tool responses. Throwing your work over to ZBrush for final design adjustments, posing adjustments and the advantages of a polygonal work flow would be recommended with regard time saved. Sculpting wise 3DCoat's weak spot with regard fluidity and speed relates to posing. Intuitively it has nothing that touches the intuition of the transpose tool nor zsphere rigging. ZBrush's whole modus operandi is based around a polygonal and polygroup workflow based on your cpu - making it superb for these advantages - there is no direct comparison and therefore a transition per se is not wholly equivalent.
  2. Bas Relief Coefficient Andrew, since V4 the coefficient setting in the bas relief tool that previously worked with v3 has no effect. I noticed that in V4.5 you have introduced a taper facility - this however is not the same as using the taper facility when setting the coefficient higher than 1 as it once worked in v3. I would appreciated it when new features are added that you ensure that previous feature functionality is also maintained. Could you please take a look at the coefficient control in v3 and bring it back. Many thanks.
  3. Michael, I know you to speak with the best intentions. I shall experiment with 4.5 and see what comes of it.
  4. Fear not Michael, Myself and Mr Smith are merely lying down to die. You go on ahead.
  5. Michaelgdrs , I have no doubt that the site will improve. As for opinions on progress? Opinions as they say are like belly buttons. We philosophize not criticize , the vagaries of the day nor the whims of the tide shall sway our belly buttons from holding opinion. To continue….. After playing tonight with V4.5 for the first time since stopping at V4.1 It appeared that I got better results in 4.5 If I used a slower more definite stroke. It was more accurate than 4.1 at this tempo but felt very different to use by comparison . Sculpting wise I had to slow down - somewhere between Largo and Adagio - the response did not seem to favor the frivolous passions of an Allegro. Could it be, ( aside from new features ) that the change in the tools responses are affecting your emotional response to the application? That the response of the tools themselves enforce a tempo of creativity that feels more Bauhaus than Bohemian ?
  6. You ain't kiddin' Brother!! S'why I still use version 4.1 Condensing and perfecting the core functionality of what is required to create art? You can do it musically with 3 strings and a tambourine . Yours monastically , Brother Floss
  7. Mac OS X [4.5.40]: Crashes when switching from surface to voxel mode when vertex painted or with pbr materials. Repeatable/ Consistent osx 10.8.5 NVIDIA GeForce 9400 p.s any application setting advise for older macs ? Performance on screen become instantly laggy when vertex paint is applied. 4.1 works like a dream on 10.6.8
  8. Here's 3 great videos on digital sculpting techniques for setting up the face. Understanding form and anatomy is one thing but applying a pragmatic system for success is another. Combining the techniques demonstrated in these 3 videos will help you set up structure faster. Whilst the software used is ZBrush, the techniques are just as applicable to 3DCoat. Open House Webinar with Gio Napkil, Mold3D TV start at 24.10 for face set up by quickly scoring lines for the main planes Dylan Ekren, How to approach creating a 2D character in ZBrush Pt.2 Mold3D TV start at 2.12 secs for quick overall face proportion set up. Ryan Kingslien - Sculpting Form vs Line or Proportions. Lines of separations to set up overlaps. Hope it helps.
  9. Out of interest 1,if you select the both the polygonal object's retopo/ mesh group + it's uv group then scale it smaller in the work space does the issue disappear with the render camera? or 2, Does the issue vanish if you subdivide the mesh, i.e is it perhaps a face smoothing issue with low polygons?
  10. A great challenge with fantastic results folks. Thanks to all involved , particularly for communicating the technical issues and explanations in the process of bringing your work to completion.
  11. CTRL+UP to create camera shortcut, CTRL-+LEFT/RIGHT to recall and CTRL+DOWN to delete last shortcut. All shortcuts are stored in the saved file.
  12. Not exactly what you're asking for but useful nonetheless
  13. Import without voxelization
  14. Or you may have accidentally held down the shift key (or is it cntrl) which will also move the gizmo.
  15. Have you imported your mesh using the 'flat subdivision' option? This subdivides the mesh but keeps edges hard by offering supporting edges - equivalent to subdividing in ZBrush with smt off