-
Posts
143 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by ozukaru
-
set exact UV coord for a given vertex, is it possible?
ozukaru replied to ozukaru's topic in General 3DCoat
thanks, I want it!! I hope that can be added soon. -
Let's say I select a vertex (as in the image) and then I want to give it a specific coord (in example 0,0 I dont want to make zoom and then try to drop the vertex in the corner) is it possible?
-
is it expected that retopo primitives are larger than sculpt ones??
ozukaru replied to ozukaru's topic in General 3DCoat
Thanks but it seems to be ok already, and btw im not importing this from a file but from scult (voxesl/surface) room. Anyway since it's exactly the double size I just halved to get the precise size neeeded. Thanks again. -
I mean the same primitive sizes in sculpt (no matter voxel or surface) room (at least for a box type), see the image for more clarity, the inside box was generated by sculpt box primitve with the same values (100, 5, 50) than the retopo but the retopo (outter box) is obviously larger.... is it expected this way?? Im using 4.8.20 Edit: I just noted that is exactly the double (is there a parameter for this?, I understand that we want a retopo model to be slightly larger...)
-
4.7.24
-
no, it was the same layer, i dont know where it came from (I just suspect of the primitives helper for retopo, in particular the tube (cylinder with hollow))
-
oops the problem seems to be solved, I think this is a workaround... I just pressed supr. (keyboard) and their disappeared from the uv island windows but after unwrapping the were gone from the retopo layer too!! xD
-
After using primitives for retopoing a tube/pipe thing and when I was unwrapping uv seams I noted some islands that does not correspond to the visible geometry, when I select the islands they are visible, I have no way to delete them I even tried delete all other faces trying to view from different angles this faces but they are not just flipped faces they are not visible in any way or selectable, as I said only selecting the uv island they turn visible, their edges in yellow, as you see in the capture, thanks for any help.
-
Sculpting Seamless, Tileable Terrain Modules?
ozukaru replied to Deadlyapples's topic in General 3DCoat
watching that video attentively and hopefully now, thanks -
the islands should be "equals" for the copy/paste onto trick, im seening in your capture that one has extra polys (?)
-
when you make a terrain you cannot use the same type of workflow that when making a normal static mesh, because the terrain will be much much larger so even if you use a 4096*4096 texture that will be blurry (the surface I mean) when your player is placed on it. You need to tile a texture but how to do that in 3d-coat? the only way to do this I think it would do like they do in unreal engine when painting landscape, it seems they asign uv when you stroke the paint brush over vertices, how can you do that in 3d-coat? is it even possible?
-
when you make a terrain you cannot use the same type of workflow that when making a normal static mesh, because the terrain will be much much larger so even if you use a 4096*4096 texture that will be blurry (the surface I mean) when your player is placed on it. You need to tile a texture but how to do that in 3d-coat? the only way to do this I think it would do like they do in unreal engine when painting landscape, it seems they asign uv when you stroke the paint brush over vertices, how can you do that in 3d-coat? is is even possible?
-
is there a way to use the vertex color to make uv islands?
ozukaru replied to ozukaru's topic in General 3DCoat
thanks, forget about it what I needed was another feature that im asking about in another thread- 3 replies
-
- vertex color
- uv
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
thanks of any help.
- 3 replies
-
- vertex color
- uv
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
how to apply symmetry AFTER an operation has been made? (paint room)
ozukaru replied to ozukaru's topic in General 3DCoat
@AbnRanger I know that feature, but still not ideal and I think it only works for smart materials -
I still see it more than a fix than a new feature... as you point before is not common sense asking the user to be taking notes about the radius used to afterwards be able the get the same depth, it would be easy for the user!!! it would work out of the box!
-
Well, thanks. I think that (from what I understood of your post (but I'll re-read it, english is not my first language)) the only feature request is as simple as that the tool works as should work, that is "if 'pick from central point' is checked then the radius should'n matter, always for a given point should be the same depth" Should I post that in "trello"? btw it says "fromt" instead of "from"
-
I hope this gif can explaing better what Im talking about (pay attention at the depth value each time I rezise the radius. can anybody try to replicate this?