Taros Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 View and enjoy: http://www.zbrushcentral.com/showpost.php?p=678350&postcount=162 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Applink Developer haikalle Posted April 22, 2010 Applink Developer Share Posted April 22, 2010 This is quite nice feature but it really dosen't rock my world, at least not yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member Jake_H Posted April 22, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 22, 2010 Interesting idea - looks like I will need to keep my animation skills up to date - could be good for previsualisation of high res meshes in a production. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member Calabi Posted April 22, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 22, 2010 It could just end up giving artists more work. LIke "oh could you knock up a quick animation to present it". Or a few people use it so everyone has to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member michalis Posted April 22, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 22, 2010 The video was simple and funny though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member T.H. ROCK Posted April 22, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 22, 2010 heh heh Some good and subtle animation technique in that video. Interesting, wonder what is involved and how much CPU time and resources is needed to render that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taros Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 More interesting for me: I can give the figure a rig and have dozen of different poses, that can be saved if necessary. I guess, I should begin to think about to buy zBrush finally... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member 3DArtist Posted April 22, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 22, 2010 Maybe having MDD support in the Paint and Sculpt rooms could be the first step? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member wailingmonkey Posted April 22, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 22, 2010 More interesting for me: I can give the figure a rig and have dozen of different poses, that can be saved if necessary. I guess, I should begin to think about to buy zBrush finally... This has been the case since version 3.0, using a combination of a zsphere rig and layers... but it was quite buggy and control was not particularly 'easy' or precise. Seems that some jiggle options have been added, and that lipsynch would have been tough to do with current versions of a zsphere rig (maybe it's morph targeted/layers instead of an actual face rig?). At any rate, I'm sure it will be handy to have either way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member geo_n Posted April 22, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 22, 2010 That is pretty cool! Concept artist and modellers will have more ways to present their ideas. I wonder if that animation is using all the sculpt details possible in the viewport. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philnolan3d Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 I don't see the point. No need for animation in a "sculpting" program. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member geo_n Posted April 23, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 23, 2010 modo has sculpting and has animation. Its not really an unwelcome feature since zbrush already has the most optimized sculpting engine currently. It would be useful for many zbrush users who do concepts studies and dont need the added workflow or cost of a full animation package. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philnolan3d Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 meh, I just don't personally see the point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member geo_n Posted April 23, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 23, 2010 Don't let bias get cloud your opinion. If it was 3dc that got that zbrush feature as well as painting on animated mesh like mari, would you reject that feature? One thing that stops me from buying zbrush is the interface. I'm sure I'm not the only one that dislikes it. Mari will probably not be versatile enough for the price it offers for personal work like 3dc. There will always be different markets for different software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member Digital777 Posted April 23, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 23, 2010 It looks cool, i sometimes look at the zbrush forum because it has a lot of great 3d artists using it. Why is the trial version still ZBrush 3.1 if it's basically at V4 now though? they seem to have added some cool stuff recently like the paint lab thing and new modeling tools but i guess it's not possible to test it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member lc8b105 Posted April 23, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 23, 2010 Interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philnolan3d Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 Don't let bias get cloud your opinion. If it was 3dc that got that zbrush feature as well as painting on animated mesh like mari, would you reject that feature? One thing that stops me from buying zbrush is the interface. I'm sure I'm not the only one that dislikes it. Mari will probably not be versatile enough for the price it offers for personal work like 3dc. There will always be different markets for different software. I have said in the past I don't think animation has any place in 3DC either. What Mari does is only importing animation that was already done in another package. That's fine, but as I understand it, it's not what zb is doing. It looks cool, i sometimes look at the zbrush forum because it has a lot of great 3d artists using it. Why is the trial version still ZBrush 3.1 if it's basically at V4 now though? they seem to have added some cool stuff recently like the paint lab thing and new modeling tools but i guess it's not possible to test it. Careful where you ask about the trial version. I asked that same question on ZBrush Central and now I'm not allowed to post their anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member michalis Posted April 23, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 23, 2010 "Careful where you ask about the trial version. I asked that same question on ZBrush Central and now I'm not allowed to post their anymore." I'm still there phil. And you've already notice that I don't keep my mouth shut. @geo_n "One thing that stops me from buying zbrush is the interface." You don't like zbrush GUI? Weird. lol Of course they don't have a mac trial for any version. Mac users (a lot there) still waiting the v3.5 update. etc etc Its the surface sculpt tools that make zbrush a great app and that it runs smoothly in any machine. It has a terrible render engine, a terrible perspective camera too and this GUI But exports great displacement and normal maps, nice tools for setting a pose too. For these last reasons I import 3DC models there. IMO, voxels is the only true environment for real sculpture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member moska Posted April 23, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 23, 2010 and mudbox is using bones already and maybe yull be able to paint weights for them in .fbx .. phil:when an arm bends ,muscles bulge so animation and sculpting are related. the morph feature of 3dc should work in .fbx too because it only works for LW.besides this animation thing will be a new pose toll (wich mudbox hadent) all this stuff will evolve in the way its done.its the next step. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member Digital777 Posted April 25, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 25, 2010 Careful where you ask about the trial version. I asked that same question on ZBrush Central and now I'm not allowed to post their anymore. Wow really? i mean they want people to pay a fairly high price for the software but don't allow testing of the recent features so you can see if you really want the program and then ban someone for asking about a trial version they put on the site themselves? Thanks for the warning i was thinking of asking if they were going to make a more recent version for people but i won't now, i don't see why they even have one though if they don't want to have support for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contributor BeatKitano Posted April 25, 2010 Contributor Share Posted April 25, 2010 Careful where you ask about the trial version. I asked that same question on ZBrush Central and now I'm not allowed to post their anymore. That or maybe you've been a royal pain in the neck (to be polite) about the 3dc greatness on a rival software board... just saying. To be honest, i can't stand you on polycount for instance cause you always find a way to promote 3dc even when it's not the subject. You're the worst kind of pr in my book. You're a bit like those sellers that run after you in the alleys of supermarket to sell you anything and you end up running the other way to avoid them. I don't think 3dc needs that. Anyway sorry to hijack this thread, i saw the zbc video, this look cool, but i don't care about animation, they should really work on retopology tools though, THAT is a part 3dc got right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philnolan3d Posted April 25, 2010 Share Posted April 25, 2010 Wow really? i mean they want people to pay a fairly high price for the software but don't allow testing of the recent features so you can see if you really want the program and then ban someone for asking about a trial version they put on the site themselves? Thanks for the warning i was thinking of asking if they were going to make a more recent version for people but i won't now, i don't see why they even have one though if they don't want to have support for it. OK the entire story is that I had used the trial of an older version. But the current trial wouldn't run. I asked about using the current one because of course there were different features. The mod argued with me that I had already used up my 30 days (several years ago) and before I knew it I was no longer allowed to post. I did end up just running it on a different computer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reputable Contributor AbnRanger Posted April 26, 2010 Reputable Contributor Share Posted April 26, 2010 Fix the under-the-hood stuff first, before we ever argue over some extra bells and whistles. Sculpting in 3DC is far short of MB or ZB, and until that changes, why are we asking for more fringe trinkets? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member Digital777 Posted April 26, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 26, 2010 OK the entire story is that I had used the trial of an older version. But the current trial wouldn't run. I asked about using the current one because of course there were different features. The mod argued with me that I had already used up my 30 days (several years ago) and before I knew it I was no longer allowed to post. I did end up just running it on a different computer. Ok so it was probably the fact you had the argument with the mod i guess although i would have thought there would not be a problem with a user wanting to try the more recent demo version as apps are always getting better and there is apps that were not so great back in the day that are now must buy so why stall on the demos which people would be wanting to evaluate. After all the new version to me looks far better than the app used to be but why not show the features off if they are good so i can't help but wonder if the features are hyped up as there has been quite a few times now where i have seen a video of a apps features (not just 3d/graphics) and thought wow and then when i got around to testing the trial out there is bad work flow or it's nowhere near to as simple as they made it look in the videos etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contributor BeatKitano Posted April 26, 2010 Contributor Share Posted April 26, 2010 Ok so it was probably the fact you had the argument with the mod i guess although i would have thought there would not be a problem with a user wanting to try the more recent demo version as apps are always getting better and there is apps that were not so great back in the day that are now must buy so why stall on the demos which people would be wanting to evaluate. After all the new version to me looks far better than the app used to be but why not show the features off if they are good so i can't help but wonder if the features are hyped up as there has been quite a few times now where i have seen a video of a apps features (not just 3d/graphics) and thought wow and then when i got around to testing the trial out there is bad work flow or it's nowhere near to as simple as they made it look in the videos etc. GAAAAASP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member michalis Posted April 26, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 26, 2010 "One thing that stops me from buying zbrush is the interface." Has anyone managed to export displacement maps (decent) from 3DC? If yes, (haven't seen so far) explain how. Zbrush may have a weird GUI but how you call all these actions you have to do in 3DC to get a dis_map? If you still call this 'displacement map'. A displacement map from the voxel model please. Not from a low definition skin. No, zbrush GUI sometimes seems excellent to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philnolan3d Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Has anyone managed to export displacement maps (decent) from 3DC? If yes, (haven't seen so far) explain how. Sure, I do it for all of my exported 3DC models, just Textures > Export > Displacement Map of Visible Layers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member michalis Posted April 26, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 26, 2010 Read carefully phil, when I say decent I mean it. Here is 'your' displacement. Its simply a translation of some normal edit I did. NOTHING. I tried everything, I'm almost sure that 3DC doesn't support displacement maps. Show me something in the gallery and say 'see this, displacement maps'. REAL!!! As Zbrush does!!! As Blender does!!! Oh my god... DO I ASK TOO MUCH FOR AN APP I PAYED FOR???? I want a dis map from the 5M voxel sculpt... And symmetry support for the mac version. Nothing else. You can play with your ptex experiments, not my concern. A stable app please. You have too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contributor Tony Nemo Posted April 26, 2010 Contributor Share Posted April 26, 2010 Read carefully phil, when I say decent I mean it. Here is 'your' displacement. Its simply a translation of some normal edit I did. NOTHING. I tried everything, I'm almost sure that 3DC doesn't support displacement maps. Show me something in the gallery and say 'see this, displacement maps'. REAL!!! As Zbrush does!!! As Blender does!!! Oh my god... DO I ASK TOO MUCH FOR AN APP I PAYED FOR???? I want a dis map from the 5M voxel sculpt... And symmetry support for the mac version. Nothing else. You can play with your ptex experiments, not my concern. A stable app please. You have too. I did a test to export a displacement map and the results were as follows: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Member michalis Posted April 26, 2010 Advanced Member Share Posted April 26, 2010 Exactly, now go to paint room, paint some bumps and you'll have some lines on this grey square. But, indeed there's a much more complicated workflow, involving texture baking tool, exporting a hi def topology etc etc. This will give you something like a real displacement map. You have to subdivide topology to millions. My MacPro 16 threast xeon just crashes. All this conversation is about 'how terrible GUI zbrush has' remember. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.