Dmitry Bedrik

This is partly true. For example, from the whole program I only need a modeling room. Occasionally - retopology. And it really annoyed me that for six months or more, the modeling room remained with all its bugs and errors, while in the drawing room, which I had never used, there were some additions and corrections. However, in my opinion, this is a matter of psychology of both developers and users. 3D Coat, for some reason, is trying to be both a zbrush and a substence painter, however, in pursuit of both, it lags behind both. I tried to convey this to Andrew, but this was left without any attention whatsoever. However, how do you propose to realize this, ultimately, this "union" of rooms? In a Blender, these are the same rooms, only called tabs. In Zbrush, the same thing, only called modes or tools. The rooms are a cool and original thing, as if some aspects of the program would not annoy me. With the current speed of development and the fact that Andrew adds new cool things, only for a fee to him personally, this association will take an excessively long time.

I absolutely agree with that. 90% of what I can do in 3D koat now, thanks to just one person. And he is not on this forum. I see some videos appearing on the program’s YouTube channel, but these videos are kind of boring. Why not ask one of the professionals in this group to make a video of the workflow and upload it to the YouTube channel? This is a great example. In this video alone, I made the decision to purchase this program. And I was extremely disappointed that, in fact, I learned more from random people about the program than from those who are on the forum. Please do this. I wrote about this to Andrew, I wrote about it to the sales department, I wrote about it on this forum for six months or so. After all, this is what affects both sales and overall support.

+1

Yep, it work. Thank.

Okay It works. Strange, I thought it was necessary to select all the layers, and not just one, the parent. Thank!

I have a bunch of objects, and I have a point around which I need to rotate them. Objects are located at different distances from the center. When I rotate them, some objects rotate normally, others overtake these objects, others lag behind, plus some of them seem to begin to approach the center along the axis. I don’t understand how this is possible (if all objects up to one do not have anything like uneven space).

How will you create this cell structure?

Hey, this was not an attempt to be rude. I mean that a number of things are easier to make polygons in another program. When I tried to do something in a сoat with such subtle objects, it turned into torture. Starting from through holes with smoothing and difficulty with adjusting shapes.

Hi, how do I enable the symmetry of all selected layers (and disable it the same way?)?

As for the retopology and comparison with the zremesh - maybe I'm wrong, but can I somehow automatically (of course, if this check box is checked) replace the current mesh with a retopology? And whether something like subdivision in a blender or 3Ds max will be added (so that a low-poly retopology can be turned into a more or less high-poly and detailed)?

Why mock the program, trying to do such simple things (I mean - the edge of the wings and other "straight" things) using retopology, when it is faster and easier to make them polygons, and then export to 3Dcoat?

Can I mirror my object without significant computer resources? I have 10+ million polygons at the moment. Not in one mesh, but it does not greatly facilitate the task. At this stage, I work in voxels.

I press (type, like letter when write) a combination. Just like in a blender, krita, or any other program.

The problem that I notice only in 3D coat. For some reason, when I use hot keys, when I try to use another tool, the program switches to this tool and instantly back to the previous one. Like, I use “Move”, I need “Pose”, I press the hot keys for “Pose”, the program switches it for a split second, and then returns to “Move” again.

Hey. Until now, with an unexpected shutdown of the computer, crashes, and other such things, sometimes the program settings fly off. Setting presets is not long, but still unpleasant. version 4.9.04.

1. YouTube videos 2. Mantis 3. I sent them to Shpagin, I wrote them here, I wrote them on the mantis, I wrote them down on YouTube. From all that I have described, the reference drawing from version .25 has been fixed.

That's not the point. I even wrote to Shpagin in the mail about this. And the reaction is only now, as if he sees it for the first time.

The bug was described by me on December 26, 2018. With all due respect, the answer to "I'm fine, no problem" is like the answer of an oncologist to a cancer patient. Like, I have no cancer, so you do not, and we will not treat you. Clear the bed.

The title of the topic is good news. The bad news is: do I download them one by one (all 600+)?

All these bugs work every time. I know a person whose computer is weaker than mine, but at the same time almost none of those I wrote about are experiencing. At the same time, sometimes in the new version, it does not work what worked in the previous one, and at the same time it was buggy and continues to be buggy for me. The fact that it works for you does not mean that there is no problem. Of course, all combinations of factors of computer hardware, system, installed programs, it is difficult to take into account, but please at least try to correct errors. I shot more than 10 videos with playback of bugs, but less than half of them were corrected for the five released versions of the program.

One of the ways (apparently) to influence is to vote on the mantis for certain functions. Ask the moderator to add you there.

Let's just say, an extreme update, like the appearance of a new person in the team, pleased me. Moreover, I stopped breaking walls with a keyboard while trying to perform boolean operations. The fact that in version .25 would not have been fulfilled with a probability of 99%, yesterday it was successfully done and left me to sit with a stupid smile on my lips. Like, yes really.

I do not need it. The extreme release of the program pleased me. But in order to avoid such moments, is it not better to write a certain FAQ, where it will be explained what and how to do during repeated program flights? Again, one person will be answered about this file, the other will be asked for the system’s data and version, the third will be ignored, the fourth by someone from the side and not even from the forum will tell you to erase a certain file (and sometimes just delete my documents) never guess.

I meet this for the first time ((not wide monitors but video clips because of this). Thanks for the explanation.

Why do you need redshift in 3D coat? Just so that he "was also" in the 3d coat? I do not see so far any usability for rendering in the program. I see it in all programs that are not obsessed with sculpting. Blender, 3d max, maya. You can customize the scene as you want, there is just convenient to do there.