Contributor Rygaard Posted March 22, 2023 Contributor Report Share Posted March 22, 2023 10 hours ago, Andrew Shpagin said: So for you it will work much faster anyway) Andrew... you really don't exist! Are you sure you are this world? I say this with all my respect and admiration! I am completely impressed with the result. I'm speechless ... to describe my happiness with the result I got. Because unfortunately using the AMD processor, in my case the Ryzen 9 3900X was horrible using the Cutoff tool! Everyone can see what happened in my previous tests, including a fatal error. Cutoff operation really took a long time between 50 seconds up to more than 1 and a half minutes (sometimes even much longer) to complete and also sometimes freezing 3DCoat with memory related problems or closed the 3DCoat abruptly. Now, happily I would like to share the result of my tests using version 3DCoat2023 . 09: 1) Test with screen recording program: - Geometry (sphere) with 8 million = took 8 seconds to be completed. cutoff_2023build09_speed_test.mov 2) Test without screen recording program: - Geometry (sphere) with 8 million = took 8 seconds to be completed. 3) Test without screen recording program, but with more complex curve: - Geometry (sphere) with 8 million = took 10 seconds to be completed. --> Note: When updating to version 3DCoat-2023 09, as I use Windows 10, it was not necessary to perform any type of procedure regarding KB5023706, the update flowed normally and successfully. I confess that I am excited to test the Surface Mode in boolean operations. Will I have a better performance too? Andrew, I thank you so much for the magical work you did. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contributor Rygaard Posted March 22, 2023 Contributor Report Share Posted March 22, 2023 Really, I'm speechless ... just sharing the test I did with a bust of 15 million triangles that speaks for itself. Cutoff operation has been completed in just 12 seconds. So far, I don't even believe this is happening! I'm IMPRESSED! Looks like I'm exaggerating, no? But I say that because I have the AMD processor and I know what I went through (really hard times)... I believe to those who have Intel must be even faster! Is not true?!Have I said I'm impressed? Thank you very much! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reputable Contributor AbnRanger Posted March 23, 2023 Reputable Contributor Report Share Posted March 23, 2023 This post was recognized by Carlosan! AbnRanger was awarded the badge 'Great Content' and 1 points. Here is a video explaining more about the performance issues relative to the recent Windows update KB5023706 and how to uninstall it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Member lunchtimesketch Posted March 28, 2023 Member Report Share Posted March 28, 2023 Looks like I'm lucky: I have said KB update, I was not aware of any issues until I updated 3DCoat today (from 23.01 to 23.10) and I came here looking for more details on what might be broken and read about cut off tests. I have Ryzen 9 5900HS mobile chip and everything looks nice: around 12m bust cut off to 7m took around 12s around 45m bust cut off to 30m took around 30s At the time of test I was running my system on "silent" mode, meaning boost was off, frequency capped at 3,8Ghz. I don't have much to compare to, but I definately haven't seen such speed on this certain scenario, heck, cutting something in surface mode was really risky and I used to voxelize mesh when it was more than 1m to cut stuff due to frequent crashes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reputable Contributor AbnRanger Posted March 30, 2023 Reputable Contributor Report Share Posted March 30, 2023 On 3/28/2023 at 8:43 PM, lunchtimesketch said: Looks like I'm lucky: I have said KB update, I was not aware of any issues until I updated 3DCoat today (from 23.01 to 23.10) and I came here looking for more details on what might be broken and read about cut off tests. I have Ryzen 9 5900HS mobile chip and everything looks nice: around 12m bust cut off to 7m took around 12s around 45m bust cut off to 30m took around 30s At the time of test I was running my system on "silent" mode, meaning boost was off, frequency capped at 3,8Ghz. I don't have much to compare to, but I definately haven't seen such speed on this certain scenario, heck, cutting something in surface mode was really risky and I used to voxelize mesh when it was more than 1m to cut stuff due to frequent crashes I had an original AMD ThreadRipper CPU (1650X) and the AMD 4800H CPU (the model the year before yours, I think) in a relative's laptop, was noticeably smoother and more responsive when sculpting in 3DCoat. That's when I sold the ThreadRipper CPU and got an Intel CPU to replace it. It's weird how some AMD CPU's work really will with 3DCoat and some don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.